BOOK CHAPTER: Land Commodification, State Formation, and Agrarian Capitalism: The Political Economy of Land Governance in Cambodia

Publication date: September 2022

Publication: Turning Land into Capital: Development and Dispossession in the Mekong Region

Chapter title: Grounding Land Justice: Contested Principles, Processes, and Outcomes

Authors: Jean-Christophe Diepart and Carl Middleton

Editors: Philip Hirsch, Kevin Woods, Natalia Scurrah and Michael B. Dwyer

See more details on the book here.

In Cambodia, the enclosure, commodification and concentration of ownership of agricultural and forest land has accelerated since the 1990s. In the process, smallholder farmers have been pushed into the margins of Cambodia’s national development. Commodification of land in Cambodia is proceeding through three distinct processes. The first process couples the titling of land with the creation of land and credit markets and is most closely associated with the formalization of smallholder land in the country’s lowland agricultural plains. A second process of land commodification relates to Cambodia’s deepening integration into regional agricultural commodity trade, particularly with China, Thailand and Vietnam. The third process is state-sanctioned large-scale economic land concessions (ELCs) that enclose and license large parcels of land and then channel national and transnational investments into such concessions. In this chapter we argue that these three processes of land commodification and capitalization are central characteristics of Cambodia’s particular form of agrarian capitalism and state formation. We show that these processes are neither coherent institutionally nor well-articulated spatially, but none the less are central to Cambodia’s state formation. They sometimes come into conflict with one another and are heavily contested, as seen for example in recent efforts by the State to address tensions between agribusiness companies and smallholder farmers.

Please contact Dr. Carl Middleton for more information.

Citation: Diepart, J-C. and Middleton, C. (2022) “Land Commodification, State Formation, and Agrarian Capitalism: The Political Economy of Land Governance in Cambodia” in Dwyer, M., Hirsch, P., Scurrah, N., and Woods, K. (eds.) Turning Land into Capital: Development and Dispossession in the Mekong Region. University of Washington Press: Seattle.

BOOK CHAPTER: Grounding Land Justice: Contested Principles, Processes, and Outcomes

Publication: Turning Land into Capital: Development and Dispossession in the Mekong Region

Chapter title: Grounding Land Justice: Contested Principles, Processes, and Outcomes

Authors: Carl Middleton and Vanessa Lamb

Editors: Philip Hirsch, Kevin Woods, Natalia Scurrah and Michael B. Dwyer

See more details on the book here.

The relationship between land and society brings much to light about the broader nature of a country’s economy, institutions, and politics, as well as its principles and practices of justice. In the Mekong region, processes of commodification, capitalization, and financialization have fundamentally shaped land tenure and governance from the colonial era to the present day. Presenting historical and contemporary case studies from the region, this chapter examines how processes of distributional, procedural, and recognitional land justice, and the plural and contested principles embedded within them, are key issues at stake in land governance. Intensified land use and deepening power inequalities have led to land exclusions at a range of scales. Most visible has been the extensive dispossession of smallholders as states have designated concessions or state forests on areas that were previously under customary management and use. While not overstating the level of success of land justice movements across the region, the chapter also highlights cases where social movements and civil-society groups have challenged, redressed, or at least mitigated unjust dispossession, and in doing so sought to redress injustices.

Please contact Dr. Carl Middleton for more information.

Citation: Middleton, C. and  Lamb, V. (2022) “Turning Land Justice into Reality: Challenge and Opportunities” in Dwyer, M., Hirsch, P., Scurrah, N., and Woods, K. (eds.) Turning Land into Capital: Development and Dispossession in the Mekong Region. University of Washington Press: Seattle.

JOURNAL ARTICLE: The political ecology of large hydropower dams in the Mekong Basin: A comprehensive review

Publication date: June 2022

Publication: Water Alternatives

Authors: Carl Middleton

Abstract: Since the early 1990s, the Mekong basin has been transformed from a largely free-flowing basin to one that is increasingly impounded by large hydropower dams, impacting river hydrology, ecology, riparian livelihoods, and water governance. This comprehensive review organises and assesses political ecology literature on large dams in the basin. Following a conceptual scoping of the political ecology of large dams, the review covers: the biophysical impacts of hydropower in the Mekong basin and how the scientific studies that research them relate to political ecology literature; relational hydrosocial approaches, including hydrosocial ordering and networked political ecologies; the ontological multiplicity of the Mekong(s) and associated ontological politics; the political economy of large dams in the Mekong basin and its relationship to transboundary water governance and hydropolitics; the discourses and knowledge production about large dams, including those regarding water data politics, 'international best practices', impact assessments, and public participation; and livelihoods, the commons, and water justice. The review details how some large hydropower dams in the Mekong basin have taken on global salience, including the Pak Mun dam, the Nam Theun 2 dam, and the Xayaburi dam. The review argues that political ecology research has significantly widened the scope of how large hydropower dams are understood and acted upon, especially by those challenging their realisation. This includes how large hydropower dams’ political processes and outcomes are shaped by asymmetrical power relations with consequences for social and ecological justice. Recognising that a substantial portion of political ecology research to date has been conducted as extensive plans for large dams were being materialised and contested, the review concludes by outlining future priority research areas that cover existing gaps and posing new questions that are arising as the river basin becomes progressively more impounded.

Keywords: Political ecology of large hydropower dams, hydrosocial ordering, critical hydropolitics, commons, water justice, Mekong-Lancang River

See the article here.

Citation: Middleton, C. (2022). “The political ecology of large hydropower dams in the Mekong Basin: A comprehensive review.” Water Alternatives 15(2): 251-289

REPORT: Pathways to a Sustainable and Just Transformation of the Mekong Region’s Electricity Sector

Publication date: May 2022

Publication: Pathways to a Sustainable and Just Transformation of the Mekong Region’s Electricity Sector

How electricity is generated, and how it is accessed, is of central importance to sustainable development in the Mekong Region, including in terms of environmental impacts, social wellbeing, and economic growth. From mid-2021 to early-2022, CSDS and AMPERES collaborated with 24 researchers from academic institutions, think tanks and civil society organizations to prepare thirteen ‘thinkpieces’ that explore the opportunities and challenges to sustainable and just electricity transformation in the Mekong Region. Each think piece contributes a layer of evidence and insight to understanding the dynamics of electricity in practice in the Mekong Region, ranging from analysis on the regional scaled plans for electricity trade, to examination of the national level processes on power development planning and its outcomes, to local level opportunities and challenges for decentralized off-grid electricity solutions. The aspiration of this collaborative initiative was not to assemble a consensus report, but rather to gather diverse viewpoints on the opportunities and challenges in attaining ‘sustainable and just electricity transformation’ in the Mekong Region. The report aims to set out some new terrains for the electricity debate at scales that range from the local to the regional, and is intended to stimulate public debate on the wide-ranging social, ecological and economic implications of electricity planning.

Download the report here.

Please see the Facebook Live broadcasting here and the agenda here.

Please contact Carl Middleton (CSDS) or Tarek Ketelsen (AMPERES) for more information.

Editors: Carl Middleton and Tarek Ketelsen

Table of Contents

Pathways to a sustainable and just transformation of the Mekong Region’s electricity sector Carl Middleton and Tarek Ketelsen

Renewable energy in the Mekong: Positive movement but significant unmet potential Courtney Weatherby

China’s role in Mekong Region’s energy transition: The elephant in and outside the room Wei Shen

The potential and challenges of regional energy transmission through the China- Mekong multilateral grid interconnections Laurence L Delina

Power Connectivity in the Greater Mekong Subregion: The need for a wider discourse Muyi Yang, Deepak Sharma, Xunpeng Shi, and Kristy Mamaril

Rethinking electricity trade in the Greater Mekong Subregion Thang Nam Do, Paul J. Burke and Bin Lu

Access to agricultural land for people resettled from the Nam Ngiep 1 dam in Lao PDR Sypha Chanthavong

Emerging energy storage technologies and electricity system transformation impacts on Thai-Lao power trade Noah Kittner

Applying global energy technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from Thailand’s electricity sector Apisom Intralawan and David Wood

Role of market, competition and regulation in energy transition in Thailand Puree Sirasoontorn

Thailand’s power development planning and a just energy transformation Suphakit Nuntavorakarn

A community-owned model as a key toward just transformation in Cambodia’s renewable energy practice Oudom Ham

Enabling universal electricity and water access to remote villages: A decentralized renewable energy-water approach Ha Thi Hong Hai and Nguyen Quoc Khanh

Rewilding the Mekong: Can the Mekong be restored? Tarek Ketelsen, Rafael J. P. Schmitt, Apisom Intralawan, Le Ha Tien, John Sawdon, Mathias Kondolf

Citation: Middleton, C. and Ketelsen, T. (Eds.) (2022). Pathways to a Sustainable and Just Transformation of the Mekong Region’s Electricity Sector. February 2022. Center for Social Development Studies, Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University, and the Australia – Mekong Partnership for Environmental Resources and Energy Systems: Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh City and Perth

This report is part of our project Shaping the Future of Mekong Regional Architecture. You can visit the project page here.